How I Won a 180 Person NLHE $22 SNG, Part V

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

I ended Part IV of this series just before the final table began. I will, of course, begin this, the final part of the series, with a recap of the final table. As mentioned in the Part IV, the final table began with the chip stacks being relatively even with nobody having a super chip lead. It was anyone's game. As soon as the final table began everyone started shouting "chop!" Well, not while I am at the table. I don't chop. Period! Perhaps in a live satellite I would consider it if four places got a prize and fifth got nothing and we were down to five players. But even then. It's bad karma for me. I simply don't do it. Every once in awhile someone would ask for a chop. I flat out state in no uncertain terms that there will be no chopping while I am at the table. I won't even chop if I am a short stack. One or two hands could easily change that. Final tables usually (but not always) don't leave enough room for real play and often require some lucky breaks, or, at the very least, no bad beats.

Ad-Td (early position): Hand #201. I raised it up to 3,600 and got called by the button, the very aggressive player who had once had a huge stack but now held fewer chips than me. Both blinds folded and the button and I took a flop of Jc-As-8h. I led out for 4,800 and the button called. The turn was the Js and I again attacked the pot, this time betting 6,000. This was a small bet as I wanted to know if he had absolutely nothing or had just outdrawn me on the turn. The truth is I don't think I would have folded to a re-raise. I had seen this act by him before. He called the 6,000. The turn brought a third jack making the board Jc-As-8h-Js-Jd. If he had quads I was going to go broke. If he had has an ace for the same hand then we were chopping the pot. If he had an 8 or a pair in the hole I could possible get the rest of his chips. With the pot standing at almost 32,000 I pushed all-in for my last 16,000 and change. To my surprise, he folded. I have no idea with what hand he could have called pre-flop, on the flop, on the turn and then fold on the river with nearly 50,000 in the pot leaving himself short stacked. Either way I was happy. I was now the chip leader with just under 48,000 chips.

Ks-9s (big blind): Hand #204. It was folded around to the small blind who raised it to 3,600. I called and we took a flop of 4d-8s-Jc. He checked and I checked behind him. The turn was the 6d and he checked again and I checked behind him. What am I doing? It would be easier to just give him my chips. The river was the Jh and he checked and for some reason I completely lost my mind and checked again. He showed As-7d and took down the pot with ace high. First of all, when it's checked to me on the river I almost always bet. It is a sign of weakness and you will take down enough pots this way, especially if it was checked to me three times. This guy was practically telling me he had nothing by checking it to me three times. I actually said out loud "what the hell am I doing?" And what the hell was I doing?

Blind increase: 800/1600 ante 150

Ad-Kc (early position): Hand #210. I raised it up and took the blinds and antes.

Ad-Tc (early position): Hand #211. I raised it up to 4,800 and someone pushed all-in for about another 22,000. I folded.

There was an all-in on Hand #215 and a short stack doubled up with the Kd-Qc against 8s-8c when he spiked two queens on the flop and they held. I picked up the Ad-9s on Hand #218 after not after anything since Hand #211. I ended up getting all-in on a flop of Ac-4d-9c and chopping the pot with the very aggressive former chip leader when he showed the Ah-9h. A short stacked player was eliminated on Hand #220 when his Kd-Ks fell to his opponent's Ac-Kh on a Ad-Jh-Qs-7h-4h board. I was dealt the following hands and folded them all: 6c-4h, 6d-4h, Jc-9c, 7c-6s, 7s-3h, Kc-3c and Tc-5c. I might have played the Jc-9c but that was on Hand #220

Ah-5h (early position): Hand #226. I raised it up and took down the blinds and antes. I have a little more than 39,000 in chips which is the second largest stack at the table and is above average. The chip leader has 52,000 and the short stack has 13,000.

Ah-9d (big blind): Hand #229. The short stack, who now had over 16,000 after stealing the blinds in Hand #227 raised it up from early position to 4,800. I called out of the big blind and check-folded to an all-in bet on a 2d-6d-6s flop. I think he had something like K-Q or K-J and I probably should have pushed in on the flop. Calling out of position is generally a weak play and I should have either raised or folded pre-flop (I should probably have pushed in). In two hands the short stack nearly has an average stack.

Jc-9d (small blind): Hand #230. It was folded around to me and I limped in the small blind. The flop was 4d-9h-Kd and I bet and took down the pot.

Blind increase: 1000/2000 ante 200

9c-6h (UTG): Hand #236. I folded the following hands in order before this hand: 5d-2c, Qs-4h, 8h-6d, Jh-5d and Kc-5s. I got bored folding every hand and the blinds and antes were so high that I needed to start picking up some chips. I raised to 6,000 UTG hoping that between the fact that I was UTG and that I hadn't played a pot in a few hands I would easily take down the pot. Alas, it was not to be. The big blind got stubborn and called and we took a flop of 2h-5d-Qd. He checked and I bet 5,000 and took down the pot. Phew. If he had called I probably would have either bluffed off all my chips or tried to force him to fold by betting the next two streets. I more than likely would have bet the turn and river. I have no problem firing three bullets with air. Perhaps too much. I have busted out of many a tournament that way. But I have also moved up in pay doing that. The jury is still out on that one. I am now just about even with the chip leader with more than 44,000.

8c-4h (big blind): Hand #237. High from the last hand I got a little carried away on the next. The small blind limped after everyone folded and I min-raised it and the small blind called. The flop came down Td-2s-5h and it was checked to me. I bet 2,000, the small blind made it 6,000 and I folded. I should have made a bigger raised pre-flop. He probably has J-10 type of hand.

Kc-Js (cutoff): Hand #240. A lot of chips changed hands since Hand #237. The former tournament chip leader (I should have named him about three articles ago) was once again in the chip lead with over 61,000. I was third in chips with almost 40,000. A player who got beat up in the last hand had just 525 in chips. I limped in the cutoff and the short stack called all-in for 325. The small blind raised it to 4,000, the big blind called and I called as well. The flop was Kd-8c-Ts and it was checked over to me. I bet out 8,000 and everyone folded. Normally I would check it down except the side pot was big enough to try and take. I was actually hoping for a call. Anyway, I ended up making a straight and taking down the pot of almost 14,000, eliminating a player in the process.

Ad-Ac (early position): Hand #243. I decided to play it like a steal and made a huge over bet. In fact, I pushed all-in. To my surprise I got insta-called by the player to my left and the big blind called as well. I had them both covered. The player to my left showed the Jh-Js and the big blind showed Ah-Kh. The flop came Qd-Jd-4d. I was out flopped but still had outs. The turn was the 8s and the river was the beautiful 5d giving me the flush and eliminating two players simultaneously. We are down to five players and I have over 100,000 in chips. My closet opponent has 50,000. The other three range from 30,000 to 45,000. A player commented that he held the Jc which meant that I had initially been one outed on the flop.

The very next hand saw another elimination when a player bluffed all-in, perhaps trying to mimic my play and make others think he had a big hand. Well, the small blind called with Ad-Ks and the other player showed Kh-4d. The A-K held up and he eliminated the player with ace high. He now has over 80,000 in chips and we are playing four-handed.

Ad-4c (big blind): Hand #250. After trading blinds and antes for a few hands the button limped in as did the small blind and I made it made it 10,000 to go. The button pushed all-in for about 35,000 total. The small blind called and I called. I thought I was getting good odds to call this one but the action should have told me to fold. However, I had put 10,000 into the pot and I didn't want to let it go. I normally don't do that but I saw all those chips and wanted them. The flop was Kd-3c-Ah and it was checked to me. I pushed all-in and the small blind called. Uh oh. He showed Ac-Qd and I was sick. But, the turn was the 3s and the river was the 6c and we chopped up the button's chips when he showed the 5s-5h. We are three-handed and I have almost 130,000 in chips. The player with whom I had just chopped the pot held over 90,000 and the short stack had about 50,000.

Blind increase: 1500/3000 ante 300

Jc-Tc (button): Hand #255. I raised it on the button to 9,000. The small blind, who had less than 50,000, pushed all-in. The big blind called and my cards caught fire. The small blind showed the 6d-6h and the big blind showed As-Ks. The big blind flopped and ace and it held. We were now heads up.

I began heads-up play with 115,000 in chips while my opponent held 155,000 in chips. He was somewhat aggressive and not too afraid to call, but he also liked to be holding something. However, this could all change during heads-up play. It is a different animal and I had not played much with him. In fact, all I know of him was from the final table. The good news: heads-up play lasted two hands. I am a good heads up player if the stacks are deep. They weren't terribly short as I had 38 big blinds and an M of 22.5 for you Harrington fans. However, this is not so great as heads-up play, particularly online, goes rather quickly.

Ac-Th (big blind): Hand #256. The button raised it to 9,000 and I called. Normally I would raise but it was the first hand and I wanted to feel him out (I think this was a bad move as I should have tried to find out then and there how aggressive my opponent had planned on playing. Besides, I more than likely had the best hand). The flop came down 5d-Tc-4c. I checked hoping to trap but he checked right behind me. The turn was the Kh and I bet 10,000. He called. The turn was the Td and I bet 15,000. He called and showed the Ks-Jc. He hit the turn and slow-played it. Huh? Terrible play. My guess is that he called the flop to bluff the turn but hit his card and tried to trap. He actually saved some money since I would have called an all-in on the turn thinking he was trying to steal.

5d-4d (button/small blind): Hand #257. The stacks are about 150,000 to 120,000 in my favor. I raised it up on the button to 9,000 and the big blind min-raised to 18,000. I called. The flop came down Ad-9c-6d. He bet 20,000 on the flop and I moved all-in. He called and showed the Ah-Jh. The turn was the 7s and the river was 3h. I rivered the straight and took down the tournament. I like the semi-bluff, particularly in heads-up play. More often than not your opponent will fold without a big hand. And even if you get a call you are rarely drawing dead, unless your opponent calls with a larger flush draw, which is unlikely.

Thank you for playing along with me. I hope you enjoyed reading about the tournament as much as I did winning it. Well, I guess that's a bit much to ask but you get the idea. I look forward to reading any comments or questions that you might have.

Please bear in mind that there were a lot of hands to recount and even with the hand history in front of me, chip counts, position and other items of importance might have been off here and there. This is not intentional as I have tried my best to faithfully record the hands as they were played. I am pretty sure that I did not get any of the cards wrong but again, this is remotely possible.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

How I Won a 180 Person NLHE $22 SNG, Part IV

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

I ended Part III of this series just after the bubble burst and continue this part in the money (ITM). I have officially cashed for $43.20, just under double my $22 buy-in. Places 18-10 pay this amount and the next level is the final table of nine players which has the following payout structure:

1st: $1,080
2nd: $720
3rd: $428.40
4th: $288
5th: $234
6th: $180
7th: $126
8th: $93.60
9th: $61.20

While making the final table of a tournament is a nice accomplishment, this is not where the real money, particularly in this tournament. I wanted at least a top four spot as this is where the payouts begin to become more lucrative. Even fifth place is not too bad, and of course first or second would be best. I always want to win but I am also a realist. If I play a tournament it is to make money. Since first pays the most it would be an ideal place in which to finish. However, since other places pay well too, there is no shame in finishing out of first. It still pays. The blinds are still at 500/100 with a 100 ante.

The moment the bubble burst the short stacks began to push all-in with any two cards. There were some who were so low they did not have enough for another round. Someone pushed in with a J-8 and got called by 10-10 only spike a jack on the flop to double up. I raised a few times and took down the blinds and antes. On Hand #167 I raised to 3,000 with the As-9h from middle position and took down the blinds and antes. On Hand #171 I raised it up to 4,000 with the Ks-Jh from the small blind after the cutoff limped and took down the pot pre-flop. One person at my table had already been eliminated on Hand #169. I began the following hand with over 27,500 in chips.

Kh-Th (button): Hand #172. The player one before the cutoff, a position that I have read is called the "hijack" position, pushed all-in for 5,175 which was not a lot of chips. I decided to call hoping that I would either be in a race or at least not too big of an underdog to a small ace. I figured if the blinds folded there would be enough dead money in the pot to make it worth a call. I admit I also wanted to get lucky and was feeling good about the hand. Well, the small blind, the former tournament chip leader who had been raising and calling everything, called as well. I am not too upset about this. He probably would call with almost anything here the way he had been playing. The flop 8d-2s-Qd and the small blind led out for only 1,000. I figured he had had something and wanted me to go away. There was nothing in the pot for which I wanted to fight so I let my hand go. He showed the 6h-6d and the all-in player showed the As-Td for ace high. I found it odd that the small blind didn't come over the top pre-flop, but I didn't mind the chance to win a big pot for a cheap price. Anyway, the 5s came on the turn and of course the Kc feel on the river which would have given me the pot. Oh well. One more player gone.

We played seven-handed for a few hands and on Hand #176 someone got moved to our table on. I figure that the tournament had 16 players left. By the way, it was after 6:00am and I was hoping that the tournament would either be done by this time or I would have been knocked out. I had not planned on playing for so long. Again, the bubble took considerably longer than it should have and this caused the tournament to go longer than it normally would have gone. I wasn't tired because I usually don't go to sleep that early anyway, but I normally never play past 6:00am.

Th-4d (big blind): Hand #177. I folded after there was a call and a raise in front of me.

We are back playing seven-handed. There are probably 14 players left in the tournament.

4c-4s (small blind): Hand #178. The button moved all-in for 7,608 and I did not hesitate for even a second and made the call. I remember this hand vividly because part of me actually wanted to start going bust so I could go to sleep. I decided that I was going to either win the tournament on this hand or lose it in the next two. Not really a bright idea but that's what happens when you begin not to care. He showed the As-Jh and I flopped a set on a 9s-6d-4h and won a sizable pot after the set held (actually he was drawing dead on the flop, he he). I was now over 30,000 in chips, well above the average stack size, but not too great as compared to the blinds and antes. Maybe I'll stick around awhile.

Take a lesson from this. Many people play well for a long period of time only to forget themselves when it counts. If you are not prepared to play the number of hours it takes to win or go deep in a tournament don't play in the first place. While editing this article I was playing in a Razz tournament (240 people and I finished in second) and someone sat out at the final table saying that he had to go to sleep. He stated that he didn't think the tournament would go past 3:00am. That cost him big because he ended up busting out in 6th and I think he was good enough to finish in the top three, a big difference in prize money. So my advice is to be prepared. Play to go deep or win. Don't enter the Sunday Million and remember seven hours later that you had plans with friends. Be prepared.

7c-2h (big blind): Hand #183. I got a walk in the big blind with the worst hand in Hold 'Em.

We have been playing six-handed for quite some time. There are either 12 or 13 players left in the tournament. I took a break for the next three hands and was dealt a 9d-7 in the small blind. There was an all-in and it was folded around. I had the Kd-8c on the next hand and the 7c-3h on the one after that. Great. A free break. That worked out well. When I returned the blinds went up. I don't recommend doing this as it could be the difference between winning and losing. I had no choice.

Blind increase: 600/1200 ante 125

Qd-5d (big blind): Hand #189. I checked after a few limpers and check-folded to a bet on a 4c-Ac-7s flop.

A player was moved off my table and we are now playing five-handed. This is the final table bubble. The next one out makes the minimum and after that the payouts go up (see above for the full payout schedule).

Hand #190: I folded my small blind holding the 8h-3s.
Hand #191: I folded on the button with the 3c-2s. I need to start stealing more blinds and antes in these spots. I should take a lesson from The Poker Grind. Raise with nothing, get called and flop the nuts. How does he do it? Luckbox!
Hand #192: I folded in the cutoff with the 4s-2h. See Hand #191. I guess it was a good move. The short stacked pushed all-in and everyone folded. He showed the Ks-Qh trying to make it seem like he was waiting for a hand. I should have been stealing from him the whole time. Damn. Too late.
Hand #193: I folded 3c-2h UTG. There was an all-in and it was folded around.
Hand #194: I got a walk in the big blind holding the Ts-8h. Nice!

Ah-7c (small blind): Hand #195: There was a limp from the UTG player who had been playing a pretty tight game until now. I called and the big blind checked. I didn't raise because I was somewhat worried about the UTG limper. The flop came down 2d-Ac-9h and I led out for 2,400 and everyone folded. I guess I was wrong. Either way I took down the pot and was over 31,000. The average stack was 27,000.

Hand #196: I folded on the button with the Th-3h. The board read Kc-6d-4c-8s-Tc. See Hand #191.
Hand #197: I folded in the cutoff with the Qd-3d. There was an all-in and the short stack called. The board read Td-Jd-Ah-8d-Jc which would have given me the flush. However, I wasn't too upset when the all-in player showed Ad-9d for the nut flush. The short stack showed queen high and we were on the final table. We are at the final table.

The final table began with nine players, each one guaranteed $61.20 with a top prize of $1,080, a huge difference in prize money. The average stack was 30,000 and I had 30,883. The chip leader only had just under 38,000 and the short stack has just over 25,500. Anyone could have won this one based on the chip stacks. The blinds are still at 600/1200 with a 125 ante.

In the final part of this series I will recap the final table.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

How I Won a 180 Person NLHE $22 SNG, Part III

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

Part II of this series ended a few hands after the blinds increased to 150/300 with a 25 ante. I will begin this installment at Hand #104 where the blinds have now increased to 200/400 with a 25 ante. I have almost 8,500 in chips and there are three players at my table with 20,000 or more.

Blind increase: 200/400 ante 25

8h-5c (big blind): Hand #104. It was folded around to the cutoff who limped and the small blind called. I checked. The flop was a sweet one for me, 8c-2h-8d. The small blind led out for 400 and for some reason I lost my mind and raised. This is actually a move I normally make as I like to bet my big hands. I find I make more money leading right out because most people never believe. But here, I was raising a bet advertising that I had at least an 8, or that the very least a pair. I should have smooth-called hoping the cutoff would either make a move or the small blind would take another shot on the turn. Additionally, the cutoff might have called trying to steal on the turn or the small blind might have hit his big card, if he had one, on the turn and I might have gotten paid off. They both folded and I took a small, but nice pot for a 1,400 chip profit.

Qc-7s (small blind): Hand #105. The pot was raised and re-raised and I folded. It was a big pot between two others at the table and one of the two ended up over 30,000.

7s-6s (big blind): Hand #111. There were a couple of big hands since the one above and there are now two players at my table with huge stacks of over 30,000. I was wondering how I was going to get their chips. Anyway, with a limp and a raise in front I folded my big blind. I haven't played a since Hand #104.

8h-6h (small blind): Hand #112. I limped behind an under the gun (UTG) limper and the big blind, who had a huge stack, popped it to 2,400. The UTG limper called and I folded. I have a little more than 8,600 in chips.

For purpose of brevity I will include a recap of some of the hands between hands 113 and 142. I still need to write about the final table and would like to keep this slightly less than a ten part series. My best guess is that there are around 35-40 players left. Only 18 get paid and making it to the money would be a waste of time. However, there is no need for me to go crazy because I have an above average stack and there is still some play compared to the blinds and antes.

Hand #113: I raised it up to 1,200 on the button with the Tc-9d and both blinds called. It was checked over to me on a 10 high rainbow flop and I bet out 1,600 and both players folded.
Hand #114: I raised it up in the cutoff with the Ah-Qs taking the blinds and antes.
Hand #115: I raised it up one before the cutoff with the Ks-Qh taking the blind and antes.
Hand #116: I raised it up in early position with the As-Jd taking the blinds and antes. Someone comments that I can't possibly have this many hands in a row. I ignore this as per my standard rules for table talk. My table image has changed.

Blind increase: 300/600 ante 50

Hand #118: I folded the big blind to a raise with the Kc-7d.
Hand #119: I gave the tournament chip leader a walk in the big blind with the Js-2c.
Hand #125: The chip leader had been raising a lot of hands and stole my big blind UTG when I held the Qd-7d.
Hand #126: It was folded around to me and I raised the big blind and tournament chip leader with Js-3d. He pushed back with an all-in play and I folded. I would have called with almost anything better than the napkins that I had held. I have under 9,000, still at or above average.
Hand #129: I raised it up in early position with the Ah-3h and took the blinds and antes.

Qd-Qs (under the gun): Hand #131: We had been playing seven-handed for awhile so I figured (see below) that there were 23 players or less left. Anyway, I raised it up to 1,800 and took the blinds and antes. I was at or above average in chips, even if there are 21 players left.

By hand #141 there were six players at my table. I have been checking other tournaments with the same buy-in and number of players and feel that since we were almost 2 1/2 hours in to the tournament this had to be bubble time. There were 19 or 20 players left. The tournament will play with the following table structures near the bubble: 7, 7 and 7; 7, 7 and 6; 7, 6 and 6. The moment there are 18 left the bubble would burst and there would be two tables of nine for a total of 18 players. There is no other way, based on what I have seen, for there to be six players at my table. So we were on or one away from the bubble. I will also make a comment later saying that "the bubble took too long" to which someone replied that "the bubble took longer than [he's] ever seen." Either way, nobody wanted to be the next one eliminated.

As-7d (cutoff): Hand #141. I raised it up to 1,800 and took the blinds and antes.

Blind increase: 400/800 ante 75

Ah-7h (UTG): Hand #143. I min-raised UTG hoping that this strange move would get everyone to fold. At shorthanded tables, UTG is one of my favorite steal positions. No one expects it. I find that it has been very profitable for me. I like to have something in this spot so I won't be on a total steal but anything reasonable will do. Well, both the button and the cutoff called the 1,600 and we took the flop after the blinds folded. The flop came down Kh-7d-3h and I led out for 3,200. The others folded and I took down the pot. I had almost 16,000 in chips.

Js-5h (big blind): Hand #144. I folded to a raise from a middle position player. If you've ever watched some of the super-aggressive players online you will notice that they would consider a raise here, probably all-in. I have spent a lot of time watching these aggressive players, such as Annette_15, who will push there chips around on the bubble if they think there is any chance that their opponent will fold. I watched Annette_15 play from the bubble to near the final table once. She pushed all-in (note that she does not often, if ever, call all-in without a super-monster hand at this point. It's all-in or fold) several times and was called twice. In the first hand she held A-3o and it held against a K-Qs. In the second she was caught with the 4s-3s against A-A and was gone. But she has made enough top 5 spots and has enough wins to justify this type of play. This is not my style although I will challenge the aggressive players if I see that they are pulling these plays. In fact, I take the play away from them by doing it first. They hate that (I can't tell you how many time I have seen her make a comment such as "that was my play").

As-Ts (small blind): Hand #145. The pot was raised to 2,400 by the button and I made a very weak play here by calling. I should have pushed all-in. There are not enough chips in play for me to give away that many chips hoping to hit a flop. I probably have the best hand and should be willing to play it for all the money. This is the time to get chips, not give them away. I check-folded to a 2,100 chip bet on a 9h-Qh-3d flop.

Ad-Jh (cutoff): Hand #147. I raise it up to 2,400 and take the very important blinds and antes.

9s-4c (big blind): Hand #150. I folded to an all-in raise.

Js-9s (small blind): Hand #151. I was in the small blind against the tournament chip leader who was in the big blind. It was folded around to me and I completed the big blind. I had a plan for this aggressive chip leader. Well, I didn't need it anyway as I flopped a huge hand. I was going to make this move no matter what but it helped to more than likely have him drawing dead. The flop was 4s-3s-7s giving me a flush. I check-raised him and took down a decently sized pot. I was actually hoping to be able to make that move with nothing. It is a bit of a moral booster. Either way the result was nice. Wait! Should I have check-called and check-raised the turn? I had an above average chip stack.

4c-4s (cutoff): Hand #154. I limped in the cutoff (horrible play) and got raised by the button (the chip leader). I call and check-folded on an A-K high flop. Maybe it was best. I don't think he would have folded an ace as he had been making some very thin calls. I still don't like the play. It's not about the results.

9d-6s (big blind): Hand #156. I folded to a raise from the UTG player. Thief!

7s-6d (small blind): Hand #157. Alright. This was a big one. It was folded around to me and I limped in. Probably not the best move but I wanted to play flops against the player in the big blind. He had shown a propensity to make thin calls pre-flop and I thought I had the advantage post-flop. Well, he raised. I couldn't stop now. If I push in he would have certainly called me. If I called, I can either flop big or outplay him. The flop came down 3h-7c-7d. Gin! I didn't want to vary my play now. The last time I had a big hand I check-raised him so I wanted to try it again. Maybe he will make a mistake. I was unlikely to hold a seven since I called a raise pre-flop. I checked and he bet out 800. Huh? There is almost 7,000 in the pot! I make what looks like a move by pushing all-in for an additional 8,200. He called and shows Ac-Td. What? A 10 falls on the turn making me sweat a bit (that would have been disgusting) but the Qs fell on the river and I took down a pot worth just under 25,000. I was very healthy now.

Blind increase: 500/1000 ante 100

The chip leader began to double up everyone at the table over the next few hands. Most of the time the chips were in pre-flop in coin flip situations which he lost. With the blinds and antes so high in relation to stack sizes, I guess it was tough for him to fold A-Q to an all-in bet. Even so, he still had a huge stack, but not big enough to scare anyone that much. He had had over 55,000 when the average stack was about 14,000. Now he had about 32,000. After the blind increase I had about 23 big blinds and an M of almost 12 for those who follow Harrington. Not a lot of play at all, especially when playing six-handed. The blinds come around much quicker and it is costing me 2,100 per round. The only good news is that everyone else is in the same boat. Well almost everyone. At least I had a relatively decent chip stack.

Ac-Qs (big blind): Hand #162. I hate this hand. I'd rather never see this one. It seems to kill me every time I have it. The UTG player limped in and I checked my option in the big blind after the small blind folded. I check-folded to a bet on a flop of 9h-8s-7h. I didn't want to go crazy on the bubble, especially since there was a player at my table who had less than 3,000 in chips. The UTG player showed Ks-Kh and I thought I was a genius. Actually I am a ***** and should have raised pre-flop. I would have folded to a re-raise but again, it's the play not the results.

8c-8h (small blind): Hand #163. I raised it up to 3,000 and took the blinds and antes.

The bubble finally burst on Hand #165. I don't know how because it was not on my table but we were now playing nine-handed beginning with Hand #166. In Part IV I will play down to the final table (and maybe complete the tournament).

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

How I Won a 180 Person NLHE $22 SNG, Part II

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

I ended Part I of this series at the last hand of the 25/50 blind level of a 180 person $22 No Limit Hold 'Em SNG. In that hand I took down a nice pot to give me some chips. I will now continue at the 50/100 blind level. I wish I could tell you how many people were left in the tournament at any given time, however I did not save this information or jot it down. I did not plan this series until after I had won and it was too late by then. You'll have to use your imagination. My best guess is that roughly half the field had been eliminated by now. Eighteen players get paid.

Js-5d (big blind): Hand #41. This was the first hand of this level that my chips were in the pot, although it was the big blind. A middle position player raised it to 300, the button called and I folded. I had about 2,700 in chips.

Ad-10d (small blind): Hand #42. Everyone folded to the button who had been overly aggressive for the last two rounds. He had raised the last five pots before the last hand and had been shoving his chips around like they were on fire. He raised to 300 and I decided to min-raise him. Normally I would make a larger raise but I had a feeling the min-raise would be too good for him to pass up and I could probably get more chips from him on later streets. He called and the flop came 3s-4d-Kd. I know if I bet he will fold if he missed, but if I check he will bet no matter what. I decided to check-raise him all-in knowing that I would not be in bad shape if he actually had something and called. Like a predictable bully he bet out 600 and I pushed all-in. His hand caught fire and he insta-folded.

6d-6c (early position): Hand #48. I decided to raise with my small pair because I hate limping early and I also hate folding pairs and seeing a set on the flop. It may not be the best way to play this hand but I'd always rather raise then call. If someone made a big re-raise I can always fold. No big deal. I got one caller from a late position player and the blinds folded. The flop was 4d-5s-8c and I led out for 300. He folded and I took down the pot. I want to point out that I play a Phil Hellmuth style game. I don't particularly raise a lot of pots but I am willing to fold hands when re-raised if it makes sense. I don't ever feel committed to a pot simply because I have chips in (ok, that's not entirely true, but mostly true).

Kd-Qh (small blind): Hand #51. The cutoff made a standard raise to 300 and the button was all-in for 60. I called and the three of us took a flop of 5d-Qd-4h. I bet about 2/3 of the pot for 500. The cutoff called. The turn was the Kh. I bet 1,300 and the cutoff again called. Hmmm. I wonder what's going on here. A-K? Set? Nah. He would push with any of those. The river was the 8s and I pushed all-in for a little less than 1,500. He called and showed A-K. I collected a nice pot of more than 7,200 chips. I of course got cursed out for the next five minutes but I ignored the player's rant as usual. No point in getting involved in that. (See Don't Give it Away: Talking at the Poker Table on this blog.)

Blind increase: 75/150

Ac-Ks (middle position): Hand #54. I am the table chip leader although I am not about to go too crazy for that reason. It's typically not my style but I will attack players who are weak, no matter how many chips I have. I raised to 400, not quite three times the big blind. I want someone, particularly one of the blinds, to call me with a lesser hand because the price is cheap. Make people make mistakes. Everyone folded and I took the blinds.

There was a hand that came up a few after this one that I thought was interesting. A player pushed all-in for 4,400 chips from early-middle position. Great play (insert sarcasm here). What can be accomplished by doing this? The blinds are not high enough to warrant such a play. Stealing 225 with 4,000+ chips is just too big a risk. You will only be called by a better hand. A raise of 450 would accomplish the same thing and not risk your whole stack should someone wake up with a monster. Later in a tournament, when there are antes and the stacks are small as compared to the blinds and antes this might be the only move. Raising three times the blinds when it represents half your stack is ridiculous. At that point it's all-in or fold. But not when you have nearly 30 big blinds left.

My table broke after Hand #65 and I was placed in the big blind (one hand too early as compared to my last table). This is when I made a horrible play on the first hand.

Ah-7s (big blind): Hand #66. When I move to a new table in a tournament I tend not to play many hands for a rotation or two until I get a better feel for the table's dynamic. The point at which I am moved I no nothing about any of the players so I try and play premium hands and ABC poker (unless I have a reason to do otherwise, such as blinds to stack ratio or if it's the bubble). For some reason I deviated greatly on this hand. The tournament chip leader was at the table and he raised it up to 450 in the cutoff position. This is normally an instant fold for me in this spot but something told me to call and see what happens. Maybe it was his screen name that annoyed me. I don't know. I called and the two of us took a flop of Qh-6s-Th. I looked at the pot and decided that I wanted it. I led out for 500, about half the pot hoping to take it down right there. He called. The turn was the 3d and I fired out again, this time 700 into a pot of 2,000. He again called. The river was the 3s. I had a feeling that my opponent held A-10 or J-10 or possibly a flush draw. I didn't think I could win without a bet. In fact, I was positive. I had no choice. I had to fire a third bullet, something I hate doing. But a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do. I made a value-bet bluff of 950 and my opponent folded. Phew. A nice pot. I was up to almost 9,000, a very nice stack at this point.

I find that when I make a mistake like this - calling pre-flop when I should have folded - I often find myself in a do or die situation. If he had top pair or a was trapping with a monster I would have bluffed off most of my chips for no reason. There was no reason for me to be in the above situation to begin with. But once I was there I did what ever it took to get that pot. I am pretty sure he folded a pair in that spot. Sometimes, the third shell convinces people that their pair or their kicker is no good. After all, how can someone bet three times with air? I don't recommend this tactic but I also don't recommended backing down in tough spots. I believe that this pot put me on the path to winning. When he folded and I scooped in the chips so-to-speak I felt very good. When you feel good at the table your reads are better and you tend to make fewer mistakes.

Blind increase: 100/200

Qc-Th (small blind): Hand #75. It is raised by the villain from Hand #66. I folded. Don't want to pick on him too much with nothing. Maybe a little later. Besides, this hand can only get you into trouble. Unless you flop a big hand it can get dangerous.

Qs-6h (small blind): Hand #76. It is folded around to me and I folded. No reason to get involved here.

As-Tc (cutoff): Hand #78. It's later. The villain from Hand #66 - let's give him a name; how about Bob? - limped in early position. I called from the cutoff. The small blind called and the big blind checked his option. There were four to a flop of 7d-Kd-Ah. Bob bet out 200, a weak bet. I would have raised without cards here. I did raise it up with my ace to 1,000 and everyone folded. I think I should have raised in the cutoff here, though. Oh well. Gotta remember that for next time. Sometimes you get a good result when you play it wrong. Either well, this helped me to mix it up a bit.

Hand #83: I folded my big blind of 9h-6c to a bet.
Hand #84: I called with the Ac-Qd in the big blind and folded to a bet on a 6h-9d-2s.

Blind increase: 150/300 ante 25

Hand #90: I raised it up under the gun with the Ac-Kd and took the blinds and antes.
Hand #91: I folded my big blind of 6s-5s after a raise.
Hand #92: I folded my small blind of 9h-6c after an all-in bet.
Hand #96: Bob is gone. From chip leader to gone. I think it was my fault. Maybe I'll send him a bottle of wine. I really feel partly responsible for that one.
Hand #97: I lost a few chips with 3d-3s. I called pre-flop and folded to some wild action on a missed flop.

I played no hands until hand #104 and that will have to wait until Part III.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

How I Won a 180 Person NLHE $22 SNG, Part I

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

As promised am going to attempt to write some articles on how I won a 180 person $22 Sit and Go (SNG). This is the first in a five part series of articles that will be published once or twice a week. This series is not about bragging or even to suggest that I somehow know what it takes to win one of these. In fact, my track record in these tournaments is not so great. I would say that I have played about 30 of these particular tournaments and am not up a whole lot considering this one paid $1,080 for first place. I have some reasonable tournament success, particularly on Bodog in the smaller to medium buy-in events. I have also had some success in live tournaments but nothing about which to write home.

I got the idea for this series from Card Player magazine where there is a feature that allows the reader to play a tournament with the writer. The feature is called Play a Tournament with Me. The writer recaps important hands from the tournament while keeping track of his or her chip count as well as the tournament's blind level. It's interesting, I think, to see how others think throughout a tournament and to see how hands are played out. In that series, small details are omitted, probably for two reasons. Space consideration in a magazine is one reason. Another is that it is more difficult to remember the details with total certainly of every hand played throughout a live tournament without documenting it along the way. I have the luxury of working with hand history files. I do not, however, have access to a few important features: for example, I do not know the number of players remaining in the tournament at any given time, nor do I know the average chip stack. I will make educated guesses throughout the article and attempt to reconstruct these facts from other tournaments of the same structure.

I normally play a fairly tight game in the early stages of a Multi-table Tournament (MTT) but I seize any opportunity that may come along. In this tournament each person began with 1,500 in chips and the blinds were 10/20 and increased every 15 minutes.

As-3s (big blind): Hand #3. There were two limpers including the button and the cutoff. The small blind called and I checked. The flop came down 8s-2s-Kd and I decided to bet my nut flush draw after the SB checked. I bet out 60 and the button called after the cutoff folded. The small blind folded as well. The turn was the Ad. This looks like a good card for me. I bet out half the pot, 100. The button called. The river was gin, the 5s. I value bet 250 and the button called again. To my surprise, when I checked the hand history, he held the Kh-Ks! Huh? He misplayed this hand on every street. I would surely have folded the big blind to a pre-flop raise. I think I got the call on the river because I bet it all the way down and he didn't put me on a flush draw. However, I never should have seen the flop or the turn for that matter.

Th-Td (middle position): Hand #4. This was the hand after the one above. It was folded to me. I raised to 80 (I like the four times the blind raise early on for some reason. It is something I have been trying out recently) and got two callers, including the big blind and the button. The flop came down Kh-8d-Jc and I folded to a bet from the big blind.

Blind increase: 15/30.

Notice that I had only played two hands in the first round and in the first hand I was in the big blind.

Kc-6s (big blind): Hand #16. Several players limped including the table chip leader. I hadn't played a hand since Hand #4. The flop came down 3h-Kh-Ts. The small blind checked and I bet out 2/3 the size of the pot for 100. The chip leader in the hijack position (one before the cutoff) popped it to 400. I thought about it and folded. No point in going crazy now even though I figured to have the best hand against this maniac. I'm patient.

Ad-8d (small blind): Hand #17. The cutoff limped behind another limper. The button popped it to 150. No point in getting involved here. I fold. This fits with my tight play early on. Besides, this hand is a loser, particularly with the action in front of me.

Blind increase: 25/50.

That's a total of four hands in the first two levels. Maybe it's too tight but I don't see the advantage to having chips early on. If I get them, great, but I am not going to chase them with mediocre hands. I am not going to make plays at pots, even if I am pretty sure I have the best of it. I have folded huge hands pre-flop in the first level, including pairs and A-Ks. This works for me. For others, they'll play every hand from the first to the last and it works for them. To each his own.

8s-8h (under the gun): Hand #24. I raised to 150 (when the blinds get higher I usually open for three times the big blind rather than the four I had been trying out in the early rounds). I am not sure this was a good move. I had been tight and if I got re-raised I could fold. A player three from the big blind pushed all-in for 580 in total. Not too bad. I called without hesitation hoping at best to be in a race. I was delighted at first to see Th-6c but that quickly changed on a flop of Tc-5s-3h. The turn and river were no help and I was short stacked. Oh well. No need to panic.

8s-7s (big blind): Hand #25. The maniac who pushed with the Th-6c last hand pushes all-in for a little more than 1,200 behind the under the gun (UTG) limper. I folded and the UTG player called all-in for less. The maniac showed Ad-6d (wow!) and the UTG player showed Kh-Qs. Neither hand improved and the maniac had a nice stack all of a sudden. I would have made two pair, eights and sevens. Not my style at all.

Ad-10h (button): Hand #27. I opened-raised to 120 and took the blinds. I sometimes open for less than three times the blind to get a worse hand in the blinds to call.

As-10s (cutoff): Hand #28. It was folded to me and I pushed all-in from the cutoff. I did this because the big blind had been making ridiculous calls since the beginning (he was sitting on a mountain of chips) and I wanted to goad him into calling. What happened next shocked me to no end. I still can't believe it looking at the hand history. The big blind did call and showed the 9s-3s! As happy as I was to see this it still meant that I had to dodge a 9 or a 3. I flopped a 10 and the turn and river were no help to him and I doubled up. He later said he thought I was tilting the way I had been playing the last few hands. I didn't think so. Either way that is absolutely no reason to call with a 9-3. I would have to have something like a 7-2 for that call to be good. You need to have something when calling a bluff. You can't bluff a call. At least he didn't say "they were suited." I'll take 'em any way I can.

Ah-7h (small blind): Hand #33. Four limpers in front of me. I limped in the small blind. I checked-folded on a 2s-9h-8d flop.

The following hand was the last hand before the blinds increased to 50/100. I needed this one.

Qc-Js (cutoff): Hand #35. The pot was raised to 150 UTG by the maniac who called me with a 9s-3s. I didn't give him much here, anything from J-10 to a small pair. Maybe even a K-J type of hand. The player right after called (he was weak and did not understand the concept of position) and I decided to take a shot at the flop with position. Normally I wouldn't consider such a hand but in this case I felt that with these two players I can steal this pot away by outplaying them on the flop. I didn't want to re-raise because I felt the maniac might push all-in with a marginal hand and I would have to fold. If I get the right flop the pot will be mine anyway. If not, I can get away pretty easily. The flop came down 5s-Th-3d, not too bad, but not too great. This made a lot of the hand on which I put the maniac. He led out for 300 and I called after the other player folded with the intention of stealing the pot away on the turn whether or not he bet. When the 7d hit the turn he checked and I bet out 400. To my surprise he checked-called. Was he slow playing a monster? Maybe he had a J-10 and didn't want to go crazy? I know he is the type to call here with an A-4 for a gutshot or an A-5 for a flopped middle pair. I didn't think he had a set. He tends to play his big hands fast and I am still not sure what to do on the river if I missed. I know I have to bet if I missed and he checks. The pot is just too big to let go. I have no problem firing three bullets with air if I smell weakness. The river was the Jc which was either really good or really bad. The maniac checked (now I knew it was good) and I bet slightly less than 1/3 the pot, 600. I think anymore and he would have folded if he had a 10. He called and I was shocked when I saw the Qh-7h. He hit a 7 on the turn. I was actually ahead on the flop! I will not fire three shots at this guy anymore. Not after that call. I now have over 3,000 in chips and am ready for the next level.

Next time: 50/100.

Check out Part II.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

Why I Don't Play Rebuy Tourneys

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

This image speaks for itself, however I'll give you a little background to better understand it. This is a $3 re-buy tourney to the Sunday Million on PokerStars. I never play re-buy tourneys and almost never play satellites. But occasionally I'll throw some dead money in. I have won a couple to make it worth it. Anyway, back to the tourney. I decided that I was not going to re-buy or add-on. I figured that if I got a couple of hands early on I can get some chips. There are so many people going all-in in the first few levels that getting chips is easy without re-buying. If I get unlucky, I move on. So here it is. I have the Q-Q. The A-6 limped under-the-gun. I pushed all-in hoping to get into a coin flip or a get a worse pair to call. Well, I got FOUR callers. Typical. I hated that one. But when I saw their hands I was pretty happy. Although with five players in the hand my odds decrease, I am still almost 40% to win the hand. The 7-3o is less than 8% to win. Well, I think I have said more than enough. Here's the screen shot. Click to see the full-sized version.



This might have been my last re-buy. Well, probably not. I laughed this one off and moved on but I thought it'd be a nice piece for the blog.

Keep an eye on this blog for a series of articles on how I won a 180 person $22 Sit-n-Go for $1,080.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

Low Stakes 6-Max No Limit Hold 'Em SNG Strategy

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

Although I have played several thousand Sit and Go (SNG) tournaments over the years I still consider myself somewhat of a novice. I never really attacked them for profit but I have managed to squeeze out a nice profit from them anyway. For me, they are a good way to waste some time and get away from the cash games without risking a lot of money. In the process, there is room to make a nice profit.

I have taken a long, long break from poker due to some important things, but over the last week I have had some free time to play around. Since I was short on time I mostly wanted to get in some playing time rather than make money. I hate jumping into games and trying to make a profit quickly. I prefer to take my time and since there are big swings in poker, I didn't want to get into a big hole with no time to make the money back.

But I digress. I decided to play in low stakes SNGs to get in some playing time. Over this last week I have played in forty 6-Max No Limit Hold 'Em tournaments on PokerStars. The buy-in for each was $6.60 with two places being paid; $23.40 for the win and $12.60 for second place. I won twenty-eight of these, cashed in seven and busted out in five. If you are keeping score, that's a profit of just under $480. I suppose that gives me the authority to write a little strategy piece on how to make money in these tournaments. Or maybe not. Either way I am going to because I can.

The first thing that you must realize about these tournaments is that they pay out 33% of those who enter. So right from the start you have a one in three chance of nearly doubling your money and a more than 16% chance of making 3.5-1 on your money. Now I know that you are saying "hey, most SNGs have the same pay scale" and you'd be right. The difference is that in the shorthanded SNGs there are fewer players, giving you a much better chance of getting paid. In a nine person SNG you need to outlast seven other players to make a little more than double your money (based on the $6.50 9 person Turbo SNG on PokerStars). Here, if you outlast four players you do just about the same thing.

So here are some of the techniques that I have employed during these forty tournaments. The first thing I did was build my weak-tight image. During the first one or two blind levels there is almost no reason to play a hand. That means you should be dumping all but the best aces (A-K and A-Q are good although I would dump A-Q to a re-raise this early). And never gamble for all your chips pre-flop with A-K this early. Be careful with pairs, even big ones. People are all too willing to gamble with you. Remember, 10-10 is not that big a favorite over Q-9s (a little better than 2-1 although I'll take it every time). If you enter a pot, raise. DO NOT LIMP in early in the tournament. This will get you in trouble. Raise or fold. And be prepared to fold to big or even medium sized raises. There is no reason to commit yourself this early. There are those that like to gamble early on. Let them do it against someone else. I practically fold everything except aces and kings during the first two levels.

Once the first player is knocked out you should start seeing some more flops. This is particularly true past the second blind level. Again, don't get too aggressive. There is no reason to get knocked out in fifth. Out of my five bust outs I made it to third place three times and fourth once. The goal here is to keep your stack either even or up a bit until there are four players left. Once it becomes four handed you need to open up your game. You want to build a stack so that you are not the shortstack when it becomes three handed. I love to open steal from under the gun four handed which just happens to be the cutoff position in this case. Start to become aggressive, NOT stupid. This is not the time to start slow playing hands pre-flop nor is it time to raise with any two cards (unless of course there are weak-scared players in the blinds).

While on the subject of slow playing I must say, don't do it. Don't give anyone a free flop. Keep your raises consistent. I can't stress this enough. Always open for the same amount every time. I like to raise four times the blind in these shorthanded games to make those who want to see flops pay for it. If you are stealing, make it four times the big blind. If you have aces, do the same. And always, always make a continuation bet no matter what. Many people call to try and hit a big flop. More often than not they will miss. If you check, you give them a chance to outdraw your A-Q with their K-9. I've seen it happen too many times. If the flop is 7-4-10 and you bet, they will fold their K-9. Check it down and you will lose the hand nearly 25% of the time.

When it gets three handed, it's time to pick on the scared player. If nobody appears to be scared of bubbling, play your cards a little more. Don't play too much against the shortstack. If you have 2,000 chips and the chips the chip leader has 6,000 there is no reason to switch places with the player who has 1,000. You'd be surprised how much people are willing to gamble on the shortstack. Be patient. Weak aces are good to raise with but not good enough to call an all-in raise or re-raise. Be prepared to fold.

But what if you are the shortstack? Hang in there. Don't push with garbage. There is always a chance that the other two players will bump heads. If this happens you cash. You must be willing to fold your blinds in these tournaments.

Defending you blinds here is not worth it. In one tournament it was three and I had 200 in chips left after a cooler. The chip counts were something like 6,500, 2,300 and 200. The blind were 50-100 and I was in the big blind. The chip leader raised to 200 on the button and the small blind called. I folded by 8-4o. They got involved in a betting war and the small blind got knocked out in third place. I cashed. Never give it up. (I actually got back up to over 1,000 chips before busting out. I could actually have won it.)

Once you are heads up you are playing for $10.80. You are each guaranteed $12.60. You want this money. The blinds are usually not that high since it is a six handed tournament. There is actually some decent play for a little bit. Don't dunk off your stack, however you must be aggressive. I am not a heads-up expert so I don't want to start giving advice in that area but I will say that others are far too willing to double up a shortstack when heads up in one of these tournaments. They figure that they have cashed already so let's just end it. Whoever wins, wins. So if you are the shorter stack, look for opportunities to double up and if you are the big stack, don't give it away.

To sum it up, here are some key points to follow:

• Build a weak-tight image during the first two blind levels.
• Fold all but the best hands early on.
• Never limp. Raise or fold. And be prepared to fold to re-raises.
• Never slow play.
• Always follow through with a continuation bet on the flop after a pre-flop raise.
• Keep your raises at four times the big blind with A-A, J-10s or 7-2o.
• Keep your stack even or up a little until it gets four handed.
• Start getting aggressive four handed.
• A good steal position is the cutoff.
• Pick on the scared player when it becomes three handed.
• Don't trade places with the shortstack three handed.
• Do anything to cash, even folding a huge big blind with a bad hand.
• When heads up, be aggressive.
• If you are shortstacked, look for opportunities to double up.
• If you are chip leader, don't double up the shortstack to try and end it quickly.

Addendum: There is one important piece of strategy that I had to add. If you are three handed (or heads-up, although you might be able to wait one or two hands) and the blinds are really high in relation to the stacks (for example the average stack is 3,000 and the blinds are at 200-400) it is time to become super-aggressive. Don't ever limp. Don't even make a standard raise. I personally move all-in until I win or bust out. There is simply no play left in this game. You have to hope to get lucky (or not get unlucky). Chip leads mean nothing at this point. Push and hope for the best. In one tournament there was an epic three handed battle. No one would pay anyone off. When the blinds got super high I pushed all-in every pot. By the time the other two realized that they needed to defend it was too late. They had no chips. It took 35 minutes three handed. When the blinds got high I won the tournament in less than 3 minutes.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

p.s. for tips on how to repair your credit , please leave me comments ,

World Series of Poker Main Event 2007 Hand Analysis

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

Who am I to argue with an 11 time world champion and Hall of Famer Phil Hellmuth? I'm not exactly near his level and despite what I think of the way he acts at the table - he needs to stop crying about be re-raised when he has nothing - he has proven for nearly two decades that he is the best No Limit Hold 'Em tournament player. His results tell quite the story.

Before I get to the hand in question I want to prefix it with a little tidbit on Hellmuth's game. He likes to play small pots with marginal hands and get it all-in with the nuts. When he has what he believes to be the best hand, but not the best possible hand, he throws out a small bet. On the flop. On the turn. And then on the river. If he wins, he wins a reasonably sized pot. If he loses, he berates his opponent's play but only loses a relatively small pot. If he gets re-raised along the way he has the awesome ability to throw away a monster, albeit with quite the tantrum. He likes to trap a lot and does it masterfully. He also seems to know the exact right time to throw in a bluff.

I do, however, have a bone to pick with Hellmuth on the way in which he played this particular hand during the 2007 World Series of Poker Main Event. I don't know what the blinds and antes were at the time but the action went something like this (according to Phil as the ESPN cameras came to the table). Phil limped with Ah-Ks in late position, a typical trap by the 11 time bracelet winner. He got raised by either the button or by the player to his right (who had apparently also limped) and Phil re-raised to $3,000. Both players called with the button holding 4s-4c and the middle position player holding 3h-3d.

The flop came down 7s Kc 7h, a perfect flop for Hellmuth's hand. There was $12,400 in the pot and it was checked to Hellmuth who bet out $2,000. I believe that this is mistake number one for Hellmuth. What is the purpose of a bet this size? Is he trying to take down the pot? If he is $2,000 is probably not going to do it. With so much in the pot he is likely to get a caller being that the bet is so small. His opponents are getting more than 7-1 on the call. Now I know Hellmuth likes to keep the pot small but he re-raised pre-flop and got two callers. The time for small pots has passed. On top of that, the pot size represents nearly all of Hellmuth's stack. He can almost double up without a showdown by taking down this pot. If he intended to play a small pot he should not have put in a re-raise pre-flop. One of the reasons to do that, in addition to taking it down right there, is to build a pot with a big hand.

The turn was the Js. Now this is where Hellmuth simply gave the hand away. He checked. What can he possibly be trying to accomplish with this check? Is he going for the check-raise all-in? That is not very likely to work anyway since his opponent would have to be on a stone cold bluff to fold with so few chips left. Or, his opponent would have to have the exact type of hand he happened to have, however it is extremely unlikely that he would bet that on the turn anyway. There is absolutely no benefit to checking here. Hellmuth had less than less than $11,000 chips left with over $16,000 in the pot. He absolutely must bet the turn here. It is pretty hard for him to be beat here.

The river brings the absolute worst card for Hellmuth and a beautiful card for his opponent, the 4d, giving him fours full of sevens. Now Hellmuth decides to bet. He bets $3,000 into a $16,000 pot. With what hand could his opponent have that would call the flop, check the turn, and then call the river? My best guess is that Hellmuth put his opponent on a medium pair and was hoping that the guy would look him up because the pot was so big. This has to be the worst value bet ever, particularly since he had the worst hand. He essential gave his opponent two free cards to draw out. After betting the river Hellmuth was moved all-in at which point he bemoans his back luck, berates all the players at the table, complains that he never gets any cards and folds, leaving himself with just about $5,000 in chips.

Had Hellmuth bet bigger on the flop, or even made a sizable bet on the turn he would have doubled up and proclaimed his greatness for a few more hands, or maybe all the way to the final table. Big hands are meant to be played strongly. Slow playing only gets one into trouble and, although his opponent had just two outs to win, Hellmuth allowed his opponent to get there and has only himself to blame. He simply outplayed himself on this hand and attempted to get too fancy at the wrong time. He created a big pot, something which he does not like to do, and did not protect his hand with so much at stake. I believe that he played this hand wrong on every street from the flop onward.

So remember to respect your big hands and treat as they should be treated. Like a rare commodity. They don't come along often so you need to make the most of them when they do.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

Bad Call, Good Result: No Limit Hold 'Em

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

In a previous post I mentioned that I hit a two outer against aces to scoop a nice pot. The game is $5-$10 NLHE and it's been playing pretty loose. A pretty solid player limped from under the gun (UTG) behind the $20 straddle and I looked down at jacks in middle position. I was about to raise when I thought about the limp from the UTG player and, realizing that he would not limp with a weak hand in hand in that position, I opted to flat call and see what developed on the flop.

The flop came down 9-4-2 rainbow and it was checked to the UTG player who led out with a fairly small bet of $40. This bet was very suspicious considering there was $100 in the pot and this seemed to be a pretty bland flop. Needing to know where I am before continuing on in the hand I raised to $110. Everyone folded back to the UTG player who quietly raised his thumb in the air indicating that he was going to re-raise. He then gatherer his stacked of a $450 and slid it in front of him, putting himself all-in.

I immediately told him that I liked the way in which he had slowed played his aces. He then said "why, A-9's no good?" at which point there was no doubt in my mind that he had aces. I thought for about a minute while counting out his raise and finally said "nicely played" as I slid the call in the middle. "Now show me those aces" which he promptly did. I rolled over my jacks and of course declared that one was about to come. And, believe it or not, a jack fell on the river and I took down a sweet pot.

There is a lesson here (I'm sure there is but it's hard to find it after taking down that pot). Oh, I know what it is. If you know you are beat, and I knew I was, don't make the call "just to keep them honest" or just to find out if you were right. If you feel you have good instincts, go with them. I have played a lot of poker with this particular player and there was no reason for me to call to know that I was right. I knew he had aces as sure as I knew I had jacks. Next time I muck them. I leave the suckouts for everyone else.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack

Big Hand During Live Action $5-$10 No Limit Hold 'Em

By: The Monster Stack (Guest Blogger)

Hello,

A few nights ago I was playing at a local card room in a $5-$10 No Limit Hold 'Em (NLHE) game. The game was full of action right from the start and the stacks at the table quickly became very big. At one point there was a double straddle on making the game $5-$10-$20-$40 (even going to $80 on one hand!), so you can only imagine how loose this game was. Just the way a tight-aggressive player like me likes it.

I bought in for $1,000 and by the time the following hand came up I had about $2,700 in front of me. To get to that point I hit a two outer on the river with jacks against aces, but that's a story for another time. I held 7-7 in middle position and there was one limper in front of me. He was a very loose-aggressive player (LAG) with a stack that covered mine so I limped right behind him so as to avoid being re-raised out of the pot. I hoped to flop big and win a nice pot from him. The small and big blinds folded and the two straddles saw the flop.

The flop came down 9s-6d-7s giving me a set. It was checked over to the $40 straddle who led out with a bet of $100. The LAG called and I called as well. I didn't raise here for two reasons. One, if the LAG held anything worth while, even a draw, he would have raised. I felt he was weak and didn't want to bet him out of the pot. I figured if the pot got big enough he would bluff at it and I could come over the top and take down a nice pot. The original bettor was a very straight-forward (weak) player who would not have led out without a big hand. I had seen him play two draws earlier and he classically check-called and folded when he missed. I put him on either a made straight or two pair, as I felt he certainly would have raised with an overpair pre-flop. The $20 straddle folded and three of us took the turn.

The turn was the 2c and the the straddle, who now had about $500 behind, checked. This was an odd move and inconsistent with his earlier play. Perhaps he was hoping to check-raise the turn with a made straight or had actually tried to bluff at the pot on the flop and was now slowing down. When the LAG checked I had a strong feeling that I had the best hand. I checked as well, which would normally be a terrible play but if the right card fell on the river I knew that the LAG would have no choice but to bluff at the pot. In almost any other situation I would have bet out here but I risked letting him catch something on me to win a bigger pot. If the river was a scare card, for example a spade or card making a four card straight on the board, I could get away from it. Risk to reward, I decided checking to exude weakness was the better option.

The river was the beautiful 6s giving me sevens-full and putting the flush on the board. The straddler instantly declared himself all-in and counted for about $500. The LAG thought for about 5 seconds and proceeded to declare himself all-in, which, in reality, put me all-in for more than $2,500. Normally this would be an instacall as this is one of the cards I was looking for since the flop. I paused and studied the board to make sure I wasn't missing anything. I was not worried about the straddle because if he had me beat and I had the LAG beat, I would profit anyway.

What beats me? The board reads 9s-6d-7s-2c-6s. 10s-8s, pocket sixes and pocket nines. I ruled out the latter two because there is no way he would not have raised pre-flop with either of those hands. If he had the straight flush he would have probably raised on the flop with a big draw like that. Why else does one play 10s-8s? After deciding that I had the best hand (and if I'm beat by either of those hands then so be it) I called and rolled over my sevens. The straddle showed 9-6 for sixes full of nines and the LAG showed me only a six and mucked.

The table then spent the next half and hour wondering why I took so long (30 seconds) to think about the call. But let them wonder. No matter how much of a lock a hand may seem to be I always take the extra second or two to run through my opponents' possible holdings. As soon as the six fell on the river I had thought to myself that there is no way I am going to lay this one down. All I could think about was how much I was going to get paid. But when I was faced with such a large bet I had to stop and think. His huge overbet took me out of the driver's seat and caused me to call him down. I had expected to be the one raising here but suddenly, things changed. So after taking the time to quickly study the situation I realized that I certainly had the best hand and made the correct decision.

When playing a hand I like to think a few moves ahead. This way, when a opponent does something differently from the way that I had planned on playing the hand I can see his move more clearly. Now I have a train of thought which allows me to counter his move by asking myself why he decided to do that instead of what I had thought he was going to do. I adjust accordingly and allow myself to see the hand from multiple perspectives thereby making better decisions. Those who instacall what is technically the fourth nuts need to rethink their playing strategy. You can call the fourth or fifth or tenth nut hand, as long as it is thought out and you have come to the conclusion that your hand is indeed the first nuts, even if it's queen high.

See you on the felt,
The Monster Stack